Evil, Not Stupid
Evil, Not Stupid
Did FoxNews make a big mistake firing Tucker Carlson? Nope. They knew exactly what they were doing. It's not about money anymore.
Here's something I did not overhear:
"Ha, ha, ha, ha! FoxNews is dead now. Firing Tucker was a big mistake. They're going to crash and burn! What the hell were they thinking? We got 'em now!"
No. No, we don't.
I've seen a lot of memes and comments ridiculing FoxNews for firing Tucker Carlson, as if FoxNews had no freaking idea what the consequences of firing Tucker were.
They did know.
They don't care.
The Mainstream Media is not concerned with making money (maybe it never was...at least in my lifetime). They have an agenda and Tucker Carlson is a problem for that agenda. That's why they got rid of him. They don't care about the money. None of them do. If they did, one of the major networks would snap up Tucker Carlson immediately. That is not going to happen.
Scott Bennet, a former U.S. Army psychological warfare officer said:
Tucker needed to be “silenced” because he represented too big a threat to the “powers and principalities, institutions and agendas that seek an unenlightened uninformed semi lobotomized quasi retarded population that do not question, do not research, do not analyze but simply digest and follow instructions."
They want to silence us. All of us.
My little website, The Asylum (thecorporateasylum.com) gets censored by Google's search engine. I'm a web developer; I know how to look at these things. I get 20 - 50 people a day there with some surges every now and then. Most of my traffic comes from DuckDuckGo and yet Google has something like 90% of the market. I am about as small a fish in the pond as you'll find. I'm a freaking nobody and they're making sure that my content is throttled back...way back. Why? Well, if there are thousands and thousands and millions and millions of us speaking the truth we become a force to be reckoned with. They can't have that.
I suspect a lot of the "FoxNews made a big mistake" memes are from bots handled by the FBI, the CIA, the DOJ and whoever. If they can get people to think this is a big win, maybe those ordinary citizens will relax a bit, maybe they'll stop thinking about getting involved in this unconventional war and go back to watching Netflix.
The system is built on lies, hence truth is the biggest threat to their regime. Hence, the constant attacks on free speech. Their goal is to control all the content. Getting rid of Tucker is part of that strategy.
You, my friends, are dangerous and they know it.
Beacons by Bob Moran. Used by permission. View or Buy Print.
Buy the book: I'm Nobody. Who Are You? Can We Save the World?
Reviewed by:
This article also appears on my website, The Asylum. The website also has several things that are not possible to do on Substack: The World Economic Forum Members Reference (thanks to Dr. Malone), Red State/Blue State reference showing Senate and House percentages by party affiliation, quotes, a large resources section, a robust search feature and some other things unique to the site: quizzes, word games and leaked communications. These latter three are satirical and funny, at least in my mind, but you'll have to be the ultimate judge on that.
Spot on inmate, I thought the same immediately. I am told to make a website often. I don't for same reasons you state, yet substack'll have to do for now. I tell ppl everywhere to get involved, pick a freedom subject- speech, parental rights, guns, medical, religion, I don't care, get involved with freedom matters, support and vote and donate and talk to your lawmakers. Your unlobotomized east coast friend.
It's about time someone spoke up and quantified the truth of the matter... Thank you!!!
One small caveat though... in my estimation the loss of accountable revenue that Fox is suspected to suffer from the absence of Tucker Carlson will be more than compensated for by the forces that demanded his removal... In the final analysis it's a classic example of "quid pro quo".