That they don't care what people on their side do is paramount to understanding a bitter truth:
There is no third position. There is no compromise. There is no middle ground, being the bigger man, being magnanimous, or anything like that.
By ignoring the corruption of their own, they have chosen to make any of the above impossible.
Most will never acknowledge that this is so, because it leads to a very uncomfortable place: if your opponent is like that, you have only three options left:
The use of force - naked, raw and purposefully directed violence to make them comply, or:
Try to avoid and evade them, move away from them and having no association with them, or:
Moving to a nation not yet under their influence.
Individualists always choose options two and three, which is why individualist ideals always loses and are always on the backfoot and retreating. This is because a person belonging to a group-identity (which can be as natural and tight-nit as it is with gypsies, jews and kurds or as artificial and conceited as it is with western woke-warriors) can act without having second thoughts or any thoughts at all: the situation suggests the right cause of action as per the characteristics and ideals of the group. IF: see racist; THEN: screech and assault. End of line.
It's bitter and it doesn't have to be this way, but this is the way it is now. Lone wolves die, pack wolves thrive.
That was indeed an excellent article... I wasn't aware of JHK... Thank you!
I like him a lot. I think Meryl Nass mentioned him one time and I've been a subscriber ever since.
Yup.
That they don't care what people on their side do is paramount to understanding a bitter truth:
There is no third position. There is no compromise. There is no middle ground, being the bigger man, being magnanimous, or anything like that.
By ignoring the corruption of their own, they have chosen to make any of the above impossible.
Most will never acknowledge that this is so, because it leads to a very uncomfortable place: if your opponent is like that, you have only three options left:
The use of force - naked, raw and purposefully directed violence to make them comply, or:
Try to avoid and evade them, move away from them and having no association with them, or:
Moving to a nation not yet under their influence.
Individualists always choose options two and three, which is why individualist ideals always loses and are always on the backfoot and retreating. This is because a person belonging to a group-identity (which can be as natural and tight-nit as it is with gypsies, jews and kurds or as artificial and conceited as it is with western woke-warriors) can act without having second thoughts or any thoughts at all: the situation suggests the right cause of action as per the characteristics and ideals of the group. IF: see racist; THEN: screech and assault. End of line.
It's bitter and it doesn't have to be this way, but this is the way it is now. Lone wolves die, pack wolves thrive.